Anonymous VPN Service + Torrent Proxy

We removed all the javascript / popup / virus ads and left only banner ads. Please whitelist us on AdBlock.

ATTENTION: ED is NOT asking for donations.
Anyone asking for donations to pay the server bills is trying to scam you.

Help our friend l0de of the l0de Radio Hour defeat intimidation from YouTube by YouTube Favicon.png getting him 1k subs by the end of February!

Encyclopedia Dramatica:Thizzlehat Junction Center/Archive/7

From Encyclopedia Dramatica
Jump to: navigation, search


Crazy bitch on a British tram.

Holy fucking shit. She got arrested too. Are you butthurt?Hello.jpg BAWWW here. 09:42, 1 December 2011 (CET)

Shit just got serious, time for an article? Britfag editors would be appreciated ;)--Polmas 15:08, 1 December 2011 (CET)
Yeah, because understanding what the fuck that woman is saying isn't possible for a non-limey--brxbrxbrxbrxbrxbrx-brxbrx 19:55, 1 December 2011 (CET)


08:35PM <hipcrime> YOU ARE ALL LIKE MY KIDS
08:36PM <Elvis> mmm
08:36PM <Elvis> Incest
 — Preceding comment added by H0xnbl0w (talkcontribs), who is too much of a fucking retard to sign their own posts. IT'S FOUR TILDES (~~~~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!

Main Page feat. Portal

Old ED had it, why don't why?
HITLER???? 04:38, 2 December 2011 (CET)

That's a good idea. Could someone get on that? If you don't have permissions to edit the main page or it's templates then just copy the markup source into a user space sandbox. --zaiger (talk) 17:11, 7 December 2011 (CET)

Ray William Johnson's Youtube Deleted

Not a troll.

This is accurate at the time of posting, but may be resolved since RWJ pumps hundreds of thousands of moneys into Youtube's wallet. Keep an eye out because if it doesn't get fixed, there may be historic lulz.

TylerRosenow º Ӕ talk º 12:26, 3 December 2011 (CET)

ROFL, epic lulz indeed. I wonder which infractions did he comit --Polmas 14:45, 3 December 2011 (CET)
seems to be back. <3 -hipcrime Emote Pop tart cat.gif 15:34, 3 December 2011 (CET)

Former featured article Erik Ribsskog wants to contribute to donation campaign



Mother of god what the fuck is she. - Vinland 01:26, 4 December 2011 (CET)

She has written 15,000 blogs posts about being followed by the mafia and denied her rights since 2008. She is posing with an axe acquired to defend her home against her landlord. Motown 01:32, 4 December 2011 (CET)
What was Jason Vorhees' mom's name? She looks like her. <- moarhate 18:27, 5 December 2011 (CET)
lol'd - Vinland 01:37, 4 December 2011 (CET)
Your argument is invalid. Please donate anyway.


<Tasmania> You'll never find out where I live <Tasmania> Because my ip is blocked by mibbit Sageu.png

Funny baby video

Somebody with more skillz than me needs to make gifs or a meme out of this baby's possessed looking poo faces.

Are you butthurt?Hello.jpg BAWWW here. 22:53, 6 December 2011 (CET)

I lol'd --zaiger (talk) 17:13, 7 December 2011 (CET)

Serial cat killer on the loose.

I was wondering if there is an article about this already or if someone is going to make one. For those of you who don't know some guy is killing off four month old kittens and then uploading it to youtube. The amount of butthurt is just imaginable.

Lord Tony 14:32, 6 December 2011 (CET)

"The latest video shows the terrified pet taped to a broom handle..." - I'd have been happy with that alone; never mind teh cawk-stiffening execution. Mr Jonzz 09:14, 7 December 2011 (CET)

"These are the actions of a sadistic human being."
I know that I personally am just absolutely OUTRAGED by this horrific tragedy!
Those poor defenseless, cute little fuzzy kittens!
*said whilst eating a hamburger*
Cows don't count though...cause they're ugly. *nods*
What we need to do is to make pythons illegal as pets and then burn them all off the face of the planet!
Do it for great justice!
Do it for the kyoot lil ickle kittens!
Do it for me! --Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 09:26, 7 December 2011 (CET)

What a fucking dickhead. --zaiger (talk) 17:19, 7 December 2011 (CET)

Article worthy? Lord Tony 22:54, 9 December 2011 (CET)

I have decided to jump in on the fun

Wikipedowantsanus.png - Link=User:SirLulzyTrollington

Christmasish POTN Suggestions

Tis The Season... About missing Pics
[Collapse GalleryExpand Gallery]

If you upload/add new stuff here you should also add it to the Christmas page. --Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 10:22, 7 December 2011 (CET)

The first one. THE FUCKING FIRST ONE. Sltsig.png

Almost 10k articles.

We have 14,494 articles. I feel like we should be making a big deal out of this or something. --zaiger (talk) 16:52, 7 December 2011 (CET)

Unfortunately, not all of those are articles:
This also is a sign that we aren't deleting and tagging enough junk. --JuniusThaddeus 17:15, 7 December 2011 (CET)
NO! The MOAR articles the BIGGER our E-PENIS becomes! Shun the non-believer...shhhhuuuuuunnnn! --Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 17:25, 7 December 2011 (CET)
We will have to count all of the non article pages sometime and see what we come up with. Also maybe we should do a clean up, but I want to assign people to do the actual deleting. People should start tagging shit and at the end of 2 weeks or something a couple of us will go through all of the tagged articles and delete the ones that are really shit. I want to do it that way because I don't want people just deleting everything with a death notice template on it without even looking at it, that is like my biggest pet peeve. I remember when Emilyplays was tagging shit and Ryan was deleting it everything s/he was tagging, they were deleting policy pages and fucking portal templates and articles that were like from the very beginning. It seriously looked like they just hit the random page button and just deleted whatever came up. I want people who actually know the wiki to be deleting shit is what I am trying to say, neither of them knew the wiki well enough to be deleting anything and I don't want repeat of that. I don't want to have to spend hours undeleting shit and cleaning up after it. Not too much pruned, just the really really shitty stuff. --zaiger (talk) 17:33, 7 December 2011 (CET)
I doubt there's really that much crappy stuff that needs deleting, usually when someone puts up an obvious spam/incoherent/retard page it almost never lasts more than just a few hours. Most of what can be deleted is probably gray area stuff to begin, srsly, how many tweenage furfag MS Paint "artists" with an ass load of USI do we really need individual pages for? But I doubt most of that stuff is putting any real kind of drain/strain on the whole of the site and, if anything, it is like a form of cheap advertising. A lot of those generic pages are good just for seeding general butthurt in various communities, which attracts moar attention to the site. If we start being too picky people will likely start to see the site as being elitist rather than about the lulz. Overall I think it's better to ~improve~ articles, or at least ~try~ to improve them before considering deletion. --Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 17:48, 7 December 2011 (CET)
A lot of them just need a bit more content too, like the "shitting rainbows" page, that was just a tiny little stub originally but then me and others ~looked~ for more content to add and made the page halfway decent. There's LOTS of good material out there that can be used to fix/improve a lot of pages that might otherwise wind up labeled as shit. You should always consider/think about how the page could be improved before you consider marking it for deletion. --Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 17:58, 7 December 2011 (CET)
True. That has always been my stance, I am an extreme inclusionist. I just think that there may be a few articles that could be scrapped, mostly user space shit. --zaiger (talk) 18:13, 7 December 2011 (CET)

Jimbo's banner position usurped

GorillaWarfare's face outperforms Jimbo's in generating donations for the WMF. --JuniusThaddeus 23:27, 7 December 2011 (CET)

I haven't seen her banner. Could someone post it? --zaiger (talk) 23:37, 7 December 2011 (CET)
File:Mollywhitebanner.png, wikimedia:L11_1205_GW_pict/en/US, wikimedia:File:Gorillawarfare-shoulders.png, wikimedia:File:Gorillawarfare-portrait.png. She's becoming popular on /b/. --JuniusThaddeus 23:51, 7 December 2011 (CET)
So much so that they decided to create an article. Needs cleanup/I'll fix it up. 23:54, 7 December 2011 (CET)
Heres a lulzier version:

Tow banner whore.png

EstherNguyen 03:17, 8 December 2011 (CET)
THIS NEES TO BE SENT TO THEM ASAP - Vinland 20:15, 8 December 2011 (CET)
I did my own this morning. You decide how funny it is but this is what I think every time I see that banner.Tit-showing-wikipedia-donate-parody.jpg --Rippercj69 05:00, 9 December 2011 (CET)
It'd be better if the 9000 meme wasn't shit and the tit-bearing photo were used instead. <- moarhate 18:39, 9 December 2011 (CET)

Needs moar mustachioed doctor. --FlamingMudkip 05:57, 11 December 2011 (CET)

VTech just kicked in, yo (again)

Not gonna lie: the sequel is way more disappointing than the original. Guillaume.r 00:21, 9 December 2011 (CET)

2 dead? No golden ipod for you! Link=SirLulzyTrollington
He still didn't beat the asian an hero's high score. CoffeePoweredPenguin 07:08, 10 December 2011 (CET)

Nurse jacking off retard.

Lord Tony 00:09, 10 December 2011 (CET)

I lold hard, the looks on his face were great. CoffeePoweredPenguin 07:08, 10 December 2011 (CET)
OMG is this a new kind of treadment? --Polmas 09:08, 10 December 2011 (CET)
I approve of this act of totally fucktardary, it deepens my trust in the health care system. ~Oblique 09:34, 10 December 2011 (CET)
She even massages the balls. What a pro. Also, damn jacking that guy off looks hard. She's really going at it--brxbrxbrxbrxbrxbrx-brxbrx 06:53, 11 December 2011 (CET) Same vid but now you can pause and do other shit like that. Lord Tony 09:38, 11 December 2011 (CET)


This combines everything we love H0xnbl0w 22:41, 10 December 2011 (CET)

Birther announces his plans to arrest President Obama, with predictable results Meet J. Neil Jednoralski, age 65, from Salina, Kansas. Still on the Tea Party bandwagon (although he looks more like he's also on the Lemon Party bandwagon), and Patriot. This story is so lulzy, I've taken the liberty of starting an article.--SadMonkey 06:03, 11 December 2011 (CET)

I lol'd. What a douche. --zaiger (talk) 06:38, 11 December 2011 (CET)
I love the little "Made In China" cheapo plastic American flag on his gas guzzling SUV. LOL --Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 09:17, 11 December 2011 (CET)
Anyone know what happened to that article about that guy who got a visit from the Secret Service because of the stickers on his truck about how he wasn't going to hire anyone until Obama was ran out of office? Or did we pitch it? --SadMonkey 16:37, 11 December 2011 (CET)

EPIC VOTN Suggestion!

Holy shit d00d...

Here's a really hilarious article done up about it:

There's also been some parody videos done, like the "Jesus responds" ones. If he doesn't already have an article he definitely needs one...although I would ASSume he does already. --Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 22:17, 11 December 2011 (CET)

THAT MUSIC IS HILARIOUS. I can't stand Obama but I've never heard of him trying to kill all catholics & christians...wat...WHAT...Rick Perry blew it! Link=User:SirLulzyTrollington

Kook Awards

It would be neat to see an ED version of the alt.usenet.kooks "Kook Awards":

With monthly voting and what not. It would encourage people to find new lulzy kooks to make pages about to try and win their kook an award so to speak. Kook promotion and so forth. I haven't been to AUK in several years, so I have no idea if they even still do their awards or not, but I'm guessing they're pretty well dead at this point. It would be nice to revive some of the uber old school trolling culture we came up with back in the 90s.

Kooks could also be lured to the forums and, rather than banning them, play with them and try and get them to kook out, make spastic threats, etc, etc.

It's actually really ironic when you think about it, GirlVinyl actually started out on Usenet but got verbally fisted in every other direction, which is what caused her to run off to the world wide waste in the first place. It would be kind of a nice slap in her face to turn "her" Encyclopedia Dramatica into an extension of the very thing that originally boot fucked her.  :)

--Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 23:02, 11 December 2011 (CET)

automated main page shit

The "Did you know" and the "Current threat" were both red links. Please make sure you guys are changing them out or just change them back to being static. This is like the 3rd time I have had to do this because there were big red-linked holes in the front page. I would rather have old shit there than nothing at all. --zaiger (talk) 02:27, 12 December 2011 (CET)

Maybe we could make it so it links to a random article considered "good"--brxbrxbrxbrxbrxbrx-brxbrx 03:19, 12 December 2011 (CET)

Partial Banning

Instead of banning people who try and blank articles it might be moar fun to simply restrict them to talk pages and limit their editing capabilities to so many new lines/words/posts per day, that way they can be poked at to incite epic lulz and further kookplosions. Indirectly and unknowingly contributing to the very article they hate so much. A system could also be put in place to prevent redundant spam posts as well as flooding, so their only real option would be to "let out their feelings" and tell us all how they ~really~ feel.  :3 --Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 09:20, 12 December 2011 (CET)

Perhaps we should modify MediaWiki:Blockedtext in a way that encourages blocked users to use their "User talk" pages to whine, and then users watching Special:RecentChanges could argue with them. That would be close enough to what you have in mind. --JuniusThaddeus 01:51, 13 December 2011 (CET)
For the most part, ED vandals generally have no clue how MediaWiki works, nor will they be likely to begin to argue after being banned. They just close down IE and cry to themselves. I suppose it could be encouraged, but not much will come of it. 02:06, 13 December 2011 (CET)
That's part of my point though, most of them who try and blank articles are under the delusion that it can't be undone with a few clicks of the mouse and, I think most, once they see that, will realize it's pointless and then either give up or try and "talk it out" as their only viable recourse. Obviously there are some persistent little spergs who will keep trying, but I think a lot of them will simply stop when they see that they can't actually do anything to the article, from their perspective, as a n00b, it seems like the article is magically restoring itself automatically.
Another idea might be to try and redirect them to the forums, or a specific sub-section of the forums, where they can bitch, moan and whine about it. It would likely be a good idea to give them the false impression that there's a chance of getting the article taken down if they "talk it out". If you delude them into believing there's such a chance you can keep them frothing indefinitely. It might even be fun to setup a complex troll, making them do all sorts of strange, kooky shit, under the belief that it will make the article go away. Sort of like the various scams that trick people into filling out endless "surveys" believing that they're somehow going to get something out of it. --Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 02:20, 13 December 2011 (CET)

VOTN Suggestion

Crazy grandma rampage!


Does this have an article yet? The story behind it is pretty epic. --Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 08:15, 13 December 2011 (CET)

Pissy Side-Bar

Fuck me that's annoying. Mr Jonzz 08:20, 13 December 2011 (CET)

kill yourself. --zaiger (talk) 08:36, 13 December 2011 (CET)
Doesn't bother me at all...except I think it should be moved to the right by one or two pixels...I'm kinda OCD like that. --Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 08:40, 13 December 2011 (CET)
I'll move it so it's not fixed to the corner as soon as I figure out how to. --zaiger (talk) 08:43, 13 December 2011 (CET)

/returns from killing self - Well that was fucking boring. Any better ideas? Mr Jonzz 08:53, 13 December 2011 (CET)

Go to Special:Preferences and use a different skin (eg. Vector, which is the one Wikipedia uses). As I've told Zaiger, the ad doesn't appear on certain skins. --JuniusThaddeus 15:51, 13 December 2011 (CET)

I seriously thought that was a joke gif. Wow, the free market in action. Glorious...--brxbrxbrxbrxbrxbrx-brxbrx 16:08, 13 December 2011 (CET)

Maybe I should look in to the mail-order piss market. 17:20, 13 December 2011 (CET)
Me too, XD. Wonder why they've chosen to advertise here ¿¿·-·?? --Polmas 09:32, 14 December 2011 (CET)
There's also places that sell fake dicks to go along ~with~ the fake piss, for those that have uh..."supervised" drug tests. Just be careful though, here recently there was one celebrity (forget who) who was caught using such things...apparently he microwaved his fake piss (at like the 7-11 on the way there I believe) for too long and they could tell it was way too hot to be normal and he got busted. --Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 22:32, 13 December 2011 (CET)
Like in Gattaca--brxbrxbrxbrxbrxbrx-brxbrx 01:02, 14 December 2011 (CET)
The Whizzinator --zaiger (talk) 16:46, 14 December 2011 (CET)

Anyone know how to wiki?

How to add a rotating banner to the sidebar. IE: I would like to take that thing in the bottom left corner there and move it in between the toolbox and the portals. The sooner someone helps me the sooner it moves. --zaiger (talk) 08:37, 13 December 2011 (CET)

Mmmm, I don't really know that much about MediaWiki, is it like a GUI sorta deal? Looking at the source code I can see how/where to put it in, but I have no idea if it would mess anything else up. A lot of times cookie cutter setups are pretty picky about making changes.
Looks like you need this: -div class="generated-sidebar portlet" id=""- -/div-
Give it an id and just slap it in between:
-div class="portlet" id="p-tb"- -/div-
-div class="generated-sidebar portlet" id="p-portals"- -/div-
Change the minuses to < > obviously. --Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 08:50, 13 December 2011 (CET)
No it's not a GUI, I'm just going to add it to the skin I think. --zaiger (talk) 08:55, 13 December 2011 (CET)
Rotating? You mean with a scrollbar? 19:36, 13 December 2011 (CET)
No I mean like you see one image now or a second different image when you reload the page, and which one you see if determined randomly.--zaiger (talk) 16:44, 14 December 2011 (CET)
You could use <choose> like we do in the sitenotice. 19:08, 14 December 2011 (CET)
Sidebar doesn't allow mediawiki markup. We ended up adding it to the skin through the server. --zaiger (talk) 18:30, 17 December 2011 (CET)

Is There An Article For Pathological Science?

AKA "pseudo science" AKA "kook beliefs"...or something similar to that? Been thinking about an article that covers all the common USI kook-science along with point blank explanations as to why it's completely with "free energy devices" point out the second law of thermodynamics and the Gates Effect. There's lots of different ones...blood/body PH, homeopathic cures, anti-vaxers, water as a fuel source, etc, etc, etc. --Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 03:32, 14 December 2011 (CET)

Troll Science --Elvis 18:06, 14 December 2011 (CET)

Requesting Blockland article to be deleted and started from scratch,

This article is just a complete mess to a point where it cannot be saved. Can't we just start over from scratch? Lord Tony 04:52, 14 December 2011 (CET)

Starting over is not always the best solution. If you feel you can give it a whirl (if you aren't 100% confident, just copy the source to your userspace) give it a re-write. Remove the tl;dr sections, make it funnier and find some of the lost pictures. ~Oblique 04:57, 14 December 2011 (CET)
I also don't even think the game itself is even funny enough to be made fun of. The entire article doesn't even have much relating to the actual game itself. Lord Tony 10:17, 14 December 2011 (CET)
You can start it from scratch in your user space and then have it deleted once it's a better article than it is now. --zaiger (talk) 16:38, 14 December 2011 (CET)

Why's the site going down and up?

Is everything alright?--brxbrxbrxbrxbrxbrx-brxbrx 05:55, 14 December 2011 (CET)

It's fucking us all in the ass...repeatedly. Down...and up...down...and up...HAWT! --Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 09:27, 14 December 2011 (CET)
Network issues with our host. It has nothing to do with us specifically. --zaiger (talk) 16:39, 14 December 2011 (CET)

what the fuck

The next time someone redirects and locks an article in progress I am going to request they are stripped them of their privs and they are given to those who are actually creating content. I have had to revert these actions 3 times in the last week or so by 3 different editors and it is pissing me off. You guys can't delete articles, you don't have the privs, and that's for a reason. Redirecting and locking them, aside from being a total abuse of the privs you do have, totally destroys any chances that the article will ever be improved or a better article with the same name will ever be created in it's place. Most of the time I see this happening as soon as the article is created. Very rarely is a good article created in one or two edits. This is a Wiki, which means it is a cumulative effort. Just because you don't "get it", or because you don't think a topic is worthy of being written about does not mean that someone else won't. This isn't the old ED, we don't redirect articles to userspace and we certainly don't redirect them anything else with the sole intention of making it impossible for anyone to improve on it. Also, we allow new users to learn how to edit here, so let them fucking learn. If you don't think a subject is worthy of existing, slap a template on it and WALK THE FUCK AWAY. Let someone who actually has the privileges to get rid of an article make that decision. I am dead fucking serious, Sysops are the only ones who can delete an article. If you are not a Sysop, use a template. That is what they are for. If I see this happening again I am going to start requesting people's privileges are given to the people who actually create content instead of hindering it. --zaiger (talk) 18:32, 14 December 2011 (CET)

Hear, hear. I've faced this bullshit with unwarranted Deathnoticing as well. - Vinland 20:00, 14 December 2011 (CET)
I prefer a policy of keeping crap articles in user space until they've improved--brxbrxbrxbrxbrxbrx-brxbrx 02:45, 15 December 2011 (CET)
Plus one. 02:46, 15 December 2011 (CET)
YOU can keep YOUR shit in your userspace as much as you want. If I see people moving them for other people I am going to start fucking some people up. --zaiger (talk) 04:31, 15 December 2011 (CET)
Can we set a defined time for an article to be moved? ie, if it is not touched in two weeks and still sucks it can be moved? 04:34, 15 December 2011 (CET)
I don't care. What pisses me off is this shit. --zaiger (talk) 04:36, 15 December 2011 (CET)
I thought the image from it was pretty funny, can we salvage it for the "asking for it" article? I can pixelize his face (or replace it with someone else) if it's a big issue. --Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 06:56, 15 December 2011 (CET)
Yeah go ahead. You don't have to censor it. --zaiger (talk) 18:27, 17 December 2011 (CET)

10k Article Get

We should do something special! Zaiger, bake a cake so we can throw it at DeGrippo's fat ass. Or I guess we could a celebratory clean-up so the 10000th article doesn't get deleted like alot of the newbie articles do. ~RTDice 4:26 PM Dec. 14, 2011 (ET)

Cleanup = suddenly, you lost your 10k article. - Vinland 23:28, 14 December 2011 (CET)
  • good point 1: ~RTDice 5:57 PM, Dec. 14, 2011 (ET)
It's not really 10k articles. The site statistics count the countless portal template pages and subpages (which is another good reason to not move new articles to user space). It's probably closer to 96 or 9700 I would guess, considering that we don't have the 6 or 7 years worth of userspace articles from (If those even count towards the total). --zaiger (talk) 16:09, 16 December 2011 (CET)
  • Can you still get the caek? ~RTDice 6:15PM, Dec. 16,2011

Kooky Entertainment

It might be fun to setup something like this:

Only make it like 30 pages long and have minimum word requirements on text sections (so they have to write out reams of text) and then actively advertise it as like the "article removal request form". Obviously it wouldn't actually get any article taken down, but it'd just be pretty hysterical to see how many idiots can be goaded into filling out a ginormously endless government style form.  :3

--Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 02:56, 15 December 2011 (CET)

Hahaha like AnonOps' form. Whatever, we have got the abused DMCA that also, drop dox. 02:58, 15 December 2011 (CET)
Ah, like those hurt feelings forms that are popular on football teams. A coach got in trouble for one of those.--brxbrxbrxbrxbrxbrx-brxbrx 03:05, 15 December 2011 (CET)

This censorship thing

██ ███ ██ █ ███ of the one █ █████ █████ this fucking ████ ██ █ ████ of ██ █████ fourteen other ████ █ █ because it isn't ████ okay? And I ████ didn't ██

TylerRosenow º Ӕ talk º 04:44, 15 December 2011 (CET)

If it's only up for a day or two that's fine, although perhaps the option to disable should be given. Anyways, I called my congressman and left a stern message, although that filthy Republican probably won't care--brxbrxbrxbrxbrxbrx-brxbrx 05:19, 15 December 2011 (CET)
Pointless. I'll just put this right nyah:
"So how are they planning on enforcing it?
...oooh, ooops, didn't quite think ~that~ one through too well, now did they? LOL
The government (at any level) can pass as many silly little rules, laws and regulations as they like regarding the Internet, but at the end of the day they all amount to little more than just overly impotent, inconsequential political blustering at it's best.
The nature of the Internet itself was inherently designed to be open and uncontrollable, a free system for all with NO ONE having any sense of absolute control or authority. As such, any attempts to impose control, authority or regulation over the grid will fail simply by design." --Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 06:43, 15 December 2011 (CET)
  • You have completely fucked up a good attempt at trolling. Pro tip: look at the wiki code. idiots. TylerRosenow º Ӕ talk º 09:58, 15 December 2011 (CET)
  • Uh...why on earth would anyone do that? You do know you can just push Ctrl+A, right? Problem sovled!  :D That's kind of ~my~ point btw...the government and their little rules can muzzle the lessers and deficients all they like, that's not my problem, those of us of intellectual superiority ALWAYS know how to circumvent and get around such things. Like I said...their rules/laws...they're absolutely meaningless to those like myself. And in all honesty the general, uneducated public NEEDS to be muzzled and NEEDS to be controlled. If they haven't the intelligence and comprehension to figure out how to circumvent the government's idiocy then they've no business at all having free speech or any other freedom. Freedom, TRUE freedom, is nothing more than intellectual advantage over others. --Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 15:16, 15 December 2011 (CET)
    • But ███ █ █████ ███ because ███ ██████ ████████████, you know? - █████████ 11:27, 15 December 2011 (CET)

By the by, what ever happened to this?

Blue Ribbon Campaign Banner.png

Ahhh, 1996...good year. ^__^

--Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 16:56, 15 December 2011 (CET)

Hmmm... *looks up history*
"The campaign was launched immediately after the passing of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) in the United States on February 1, 1996, followed by the Black World Wide Web protest on February 8, 1996, and remained popular throughout the 1990s and into the early 2000s. The Communications Decency Act was ruled unconstitutional in large part by the Supreme Court on June 26, 1997 in a joint ACLU/EFF suit. EFF relaunched the campaign on June 15, 1998 to raise awareness of other legislation that they felt threatened freedom of expression online, especially the CDA follow-up bill, the Child Online Protection Act (COPA), also eventually overturned.", history repeats apparently...only no blue ribbons this time around? For ~shame~... I hope it does pass...just so we can all have the satisfaction of watching the Supreme Court deliver a swift ass blistering!  :D
--Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 17:03, 15 December 2011 (CET)

Open SOPA markup – Don't forget to make yourselves heard at --JuniusThaddeus 14:54, 15 December 2011 (CET)


Over 10k articles TKN

As I've said previously, they're not all articles. The statistics count Portal pages and subpages as articles. --JuniusThaddeus 21:59, 15 December 2011 (CET)
Somebody should do something about that TKN 18:42, 17 December 2011 (CET)

The Day /b/ Made Someone Stick A Mouse In Their Ass

(click to enlarge) Mouseupass.jpg Link=User:SirLulzyTrollington

Lol, wow. I love the internet--brxbrxbrxbrxbrxbrx-brxbrx 05:56, 16 December 2011 (CET)
"made someone"...mmmm...more like provided a convenient excuse for them to do what ~they~ wanted. That's the magic of /b/, every and any depraved, horrible, nasty, disgusting thing you can think of doing isn't just encouraged, it's practically promoted. Coupled with the sheeple mentality pretty much anything and everything is possible there. Personally I'm waiting for some dipshit to jump off a cliff, break every bone in his body and then get interviewed afterwards and claim that /b/ ~told~ him to do it. /b/ is effectively the "ass end" of the Internet, attracting the most uneducated, sophomoric, chucklefucks imaginable. The whole place ought to be renamed to "Retard Town". --Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 08:56, 16 December 2011 (CET)
Nice recap of everything already on the /b/ article. - Vinland 13:51, 16 December 2011 (CET)

Follow-up QOTN to Sprocket's autisticity

MLP taught him how to cry.

lawl, pony fags. ~Oblique 21:58, 16 December 2011 (CET)

SOPA delayed until next month December 21st January? --JuniusThaddeus 23:23, 16 December 2011 (CET)

Does that mean we get to live? ~Oblique 23:27, 16 December 2011 (CET)
Well that's disappointing! Yeesh, just get on with it already! I wanna see the Supreme Court boot fuck it like the boot fucked the last two incarnations. First it was "decency" then it was "won't someone think of the children?" and now it's "scary pirates"...but it's all the same shit and it all gets hammered the fuck into oblivion by the Supreme Court in the end. --Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 00:18, 17 December 2011 (CET)
lol America. I for one am glad to be 12,000 miles away from it <3. ~Oblique 00:39, 17 December 2011 (CET)
It amazes me how short the average American attention span is. I mean people are blustering all over the place like this shit hasn't ~already~ happened...TWICE! I know I wasn't the ~only~ person online back in 1996, so somehow everyone just magically shit out their memories of the Blue Ribbon Campaign and the CDA and then later the COPA. They're basically the EXACT same bill as SOPA, both of which were passed in congress, both of which wound up in the Supreme Court shortly thereafter, both of which were then curb stomped into the fuckin ground. Same old shit, different acronym. --Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 01:52, 17 December 2011 (CET)
I'm 20 now, and when all that other shit happened, I was too young to care--brxbrxbrxbrxbrxbrx-brxbrx 03:14, 17 December 2011 (CET)
Yeah all this stuff has made me realize just how much of an oldfag I've become. It's weird to think that I've been online for about two decades now...doesn't feel like it's been that long. --Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 03:28, 17 December 2011 (CET), it'll resume on December 21st. --JuniusThaddeus 04:08, 17 December 2011 (CET)

Well, today is Judgment Day. That is if this is the day it goes through the Court, (which I think it is). Ariodon 13:18, 21 December 2011 (CET)

It's still in Committee. Today is the day that markup resumes. --JuniusThaddeus 13:52, 21 December 2011 (CET)
Disregard that. It was postponed until next year. Even the Committee's SOPA webpage uses strikethroughs. --JuniusThaddeus 15:37, 21 December 2011 (CET)

This is the shit that I'm talking about

All of these redirects were originally articles that some asshole editor decided weren't "good enough" and redirected to "shit nobody cares about" and some other shit. This is an abuse of your privileges. The job of deleting articles falls solely in the hands of Sysops. If you don't like something, throw a template on it and/or contact and admin, DO NOT blank articles (unless they are advertising spam), DO NOT redirect them and DO NOT lock them. Let the sysops do their duties. We don't have 40 sysops like did for a reason. --zaiger (talk) 19:24, 17 December 2011 (CET)

Patrolling edits

Could the sysops start making sure they are marking edits as patrolled please? This is to make sure that people aren't sneaking in spam or other any undesirable actions. I am guilty of this too, just keep it in mind when going through recent changes. When you see a red "!" next to a new edit that is not from another sysop just click the (diff|xxx) and then [Mark as patrolled], thanks. --zaiger (talk) 22:31, 17 December 2011 (CET)

Seriously? And sysop edits are automatically marked patrolled. And we should at least give editors autopatrolled too. TKN 22:55, 17 December 2011 (CET)
I second the idea of giving editors autopatrolled, editor is not an automatic right like autoconfirmed is, it's something you earn through the trust of others, so unless you're a fucking moron and go and fuck up a lot of pages (if you do this you shouldn't have the rights in the first place) then I see no harm in that. ~Oblique 23:05, 17 December 2011 (CET)
What do you mean seriously? It's a simple request, if you check an edit, mark it as patrolled. No need to act all indignant like I am asking you to fucking strain yourself or something. What the fuck do you have sysop for if you aren't willing to help other sysops know if something has been checked or not? And no I can't give editor autopatrol because as of right now they are all need to have their edits checked. --zaiger (talk) 03:12, 18 December 2011 (CET)
And no it is not a "trusted" position, we give editor to anyone who asks as long as they edit regularly. --zaiger (talk) 03:14, 18 December 2011 (CET)
/me loves to patrol :3 (but his PC exploded yesterday and has to edit with mobile devices). º_º 03:21, 18 December 2011 (CET)
@Zaiger: I suggested autopatrolled for editors since they can patrol other's edits and have rollback. TKN 17:21, 18 December 2011 (CET)

Article of the nao

I know nobody cares, but constantly featuring douchebags that nobody gives a single fuck about for the AOTN is retarded. Lolcows are cool and all, but at this point it's just like "hey there's a random faggot lets feature him." <- moarhate 17:52, 18 December 2011 (CET)

I know it's not the place to say it, but now that Christmas it's coming it's time to feature Jesus article, I've worked on it a lot since the new ED and it looks presentable now. --Polmas 20:28, 18 December 2011 (CET)

I second both l: 3(l). ~RTDice 5:52PM Dec. 18, 2011 (CET)

I'll set Jesus as dec 22nd AOTN TKN 23:58, 18 December 2011 (CET)
If you are referring to the needledrop article, he is not some random lolcow, he is a prolific music reviewer with over 5000 subscribers and 12,330,755 combined views. So quite well known actually. Elvis 01:27, 19 December 2011 (CET)
No, he isn't. <- moarhate 04:44, 19 December 2011 (CET)
() TKN 01:34, 19 December 2011 (CET)
Oh ok i see hehe... Elvis 01:39, 19 December 2011 (CET)

  • moarhate makes an interesting point. There was a time when most of ED's AOTN were home-grown. See: Meme Combining, You, and ED's endless efforts to push the popularization of the term an hero.
Since the birth of most of the featured articles have been about internet nobodies and their butthurt over's new reign of terror. It's kind of like when SNL switched from a character-driven show to a politically-themed show. It's lost some of the magic. To be perfectly honest, lately I've been finding better articles in the factoid section. This could be remedied if the Sysops made a conscious effort to feature the articles that contain rich, lulzy content rather than the ones that tell a story of nerd rage. TylerRosenow º Ӕ talk º 02:41, 19 December 2011 (CET)
  • Also, KJI is dead. Featured article amehbeh!? !!! TylerRosenow º Ӕ talk º 18:31, 19 December 2011 (CET)
Memes are not lulz, ED is about lulz. This isn't Sherrod's ED. This isn't Know your meme 2, this isn't the fucking Cheezeburger network. This is ED, and encyclopedia about Internet DRAMA. Obviously you guys don't know what the word lulz means. Lulz and lol are not interchangeable.--zaiger (talk) 06:28, 21 December 2011 (CET)
I get your point, but drama concerning a basement dweller is not lulz nor drama, it's shit nobody cares about. The last real article of note concerning a basement dweller was Jessi Slaughter in my memory, and really just because she got her family worked up. I'm sure there have been a few in the in-between time that I missed. <- moarhate 01:13, 22 December 2011 (CET)
That is you opinion, and it is in the minority. Every AOTN we have featured is about someone who has caused some sort of drama or another, and that is what we are here for. --zaiger (talk) 20:09, 22 December 2011 (CET)
On a totally unrelated note, you spelt article wrong. ~Oblique 06:36, 21 December 2011 (CET)
It's funny how your brain auto-fixes typos while you're reading them. <- moarhate 01:15, 22 December 2011 (CET)

Can Haz Financial Solvency?

Now that we've got ads (A long overdue addition I might add), anyone know what ED's fiscal situation is now? Due to the absence of banners begging for my jewgolds, I'm assuming we're in the black. --RTDice 00:22, 19 December 2011 (CET)

Yeah, those jew e-begging campaigns are annoying as hell |D --Polmas 09:11, 19 December 2011 (CET)
I'm sorry to have annoyed you by supplying a website for you and 150k daily users like you to use and then asking for help paying for it. We are paid for the month and haven't collected a penny in ad revenue yet so who knows. The ads won't come close to paying for our whole bill every month when they do pay out, as they are commission based and you are all filthy freeloading jews, but it's better than nothing. --zaiger (talk) 06:46, 21 December 2011 (CET)
Hey bro, I've got no problem with the ads, I just want to make sure we've got enough to get by. --RTDice 00:47, 22 December 2011 (CET)
No that's fine, I was t5alking to the person posting underneath you.--zaiger (talk) 01:12, 22 December 2011 (CET)

QOTN for Christmas

Does anyone wants to suggest one? º_º 02:39, 19 December 2011 (CET)

More related to christmas, please. º_º 02:51, 19 December 2011 (CET)
  • Christmas is a religious holiday, but meh. Let me try out some holiday jokes.

1) A Jewish Santa Claus came down the chimney and said: "Anyone want to buy a present?"

2) The 3 stages of man: He believes in Santa Claus. He doesn't believe in Santa Claus. He is Santa Claus. >yfw you realize it's true.

3) Q: Do you know why Santa doesn't have any children ??? A: he only comes once a year and that's down a chimney ... (wah, wah)

4) ???

5) Presents.

TylerRosenow º Ӕ talk º 07:09, 20 December 2011 (CET)

"The main reason Santa is so jolly is because he knows where all the bad girls live." - George Carlin Mr Jonzz 18:37, 19 December 2011 (CET)

X The Hedgehog

Take your real name for example "Tony" and google search "Tony The Hedgehog." Literally everyone's real name has already been in front of a hedgehog persona. Lord Tony 02:48, 19 December 2011 (CET)

We have a sonic fanon wiki article, along with a sonic news network one. 03:02, 19 December 2011 (CET)
[lol awesome] --zaiger (talk) 01:16, 22 December 2011 (CET)
LOL, that'd be a good one for the Christmas PotN! --Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 20:59, 22 December 2011 (CET)

Making Comic, Help a Nigga' Out.

About 2 weeks ago, after reading ED and the awesome history of our fair interbutts for about 3 years, I decided to do a 4chan based war comic based on events in internet history. So far I've decided to adapt:

I've made a few mock-ups, converted 4Chan into a sprawling island city-state (with ED, SA, and Memebase on its coast), and have the first seven pages done. My scanner's out so I can't upload anything, but if you guys have any ideas you think I ought to add, just leave a comment. thx. --RTDice 21:52, 19 December 2011 (CET)

YouTube Civil War should be included, and furry war was in 2007. 23:12, 19 December 2011 (CET)
  • good idea Meep, it'd make a good lead in. --RTDice 00:32, 20 December 2011 (CET)

You need to include The Meow Wars...the biggest flame war in the entire history of the Internet itself...your God it was glorious!
The One True History...
I've been trying to start a revival of The Grand And Glorious Empire Of The Meow...although technically speaking every ED, 4Chan, SA, etc regular is already a Meower, simply because they're all based upon original Usenet trolling culture. Effectively the original form of Anonymous and such. Meow?
--Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 21:50, 21 December 2011 (CET)
  • Meow wars could be used as a minor conflict later on, but I'm looking for OVERTLY 4chan related battles to use.--RTDice 21:29, 22 December 2011 (CET)
Minor conflict? LOL 4Chan would have never even ~existed~ without the Meow Wars. The Meow Wars was effectively ~the~ starting point for online trolling culture, first giving rise to groups like the Flonk, AF, AUK, etc which then in turn inspired all the World Wide Waste groups and communities. In fact ~most~ of 4Chan's little "rules" are ripped off Usenet and IRC memes from the late 90s, along with a heavy rapeage of pop-tween mainstream media at the time....V For Vendetta, Fight Club, various comic slurpage, etc, etc. Most of the originals are better, like number 31, "TITS or GTFO", was originally PTOGTFO (post tits or get the fuck out). Imagine if 4Chan was able to pull a DDoS attack on the WHOLE of the entire Internet itself for nearly a YEAR straight...~that~ is what the Meow Wars was...a good decade before DDoS attacks even existed! You have no idea just how epic it was, it literally brought the whole of the grid to its fucking knees! --Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 13:23, 22 December 2011 (CET)
  • Damn, I had no idea it was so far reaching. I'm sure I could find a way to properly convey its importance, thanks for the insight man. --RTDice 21:33, 22 December 2011 (CET)

Wikipedia vs. SOPA

wikipedia:Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)#Coordinated_SOPA_reaction_in_early_2012_RfC --JuniusThaddeus 23:05, 19 December 2011 (CET)

SERIOUS FUCKING BUSINESS. - Vinland 04:13, 20 December 2011 (CET)
Oh now that's entertaining. LOL Run a text search on that page for "CDA", "COPA", "1996" or "decency"...guess what comes up? Yeah, that's right...jack fucking squat! Tha'fawk, how did people get so gawd damn Jesus raping STUPID?! I mean...seriously, I don't mean to go off on a rant here, but 19 fuckin 96 did *NOT* happen ~that~ gawd damn long ago for fuck sake! I tell ya, my faith in humanity...seriously startin to burn out completely.
It's the air I think...too many people, too much carbon dioxide in the fact if you look at the absolutely STAGGERING population EXPLOSION over the past 100 years and stick it right over on top of the carbon dioxide level increases it's nearly a gawd damn perfect fucking match. It's not pollution or industry that's killing us all or screwing up the air, it's PEOPLE, too many gawd damn stupid fuckin monkeys!
And while I certainly admire the bold and admirable work of the United States Military to dump over 350 TONS of nuclear waste material all over the entire sand nigger population in the form of "depleted uranium rounds" (such a lovely, cutesy, innocent sounding name), in an effort to ensure that those filthy bastards won't ever be able to reproduce...yeah, it's not enough, seriously, the stupidity is reaching an epidemic level! THE ZOMBPOCALYPSE WILL SOON BE UPON US!
...mmmm, that shit's pretty good...I should make a book out of it! LOL
--Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 09:02, 20 December 2011 (CET)
BTW, in case I wasn't clear enough on that, increased levels of carbon dioxide and less oxygen in the air equals the human brain unable to process normally, basically making you stupider/crazier to the point where you're effectively a living zombie!  :D
Carbon dioxide poisoning can be a VERY slow, painful, agonizing way to die. ^__^

By the way, who wants to take bets, on how fast they ban me?, I mean. ^__^

--Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 12:40, 20 December 2011 (CET) – They've decided to censor you instead. --JuniusThaddeus 15:12, 20 December 2011 (CET)
Typical. There are very few places left that don't censor fact you can count them on one hand. Wired is my favorite. I have lots of neat tools to ensure that nothing is ever truly deleted. Automatic screen capping bots, Lazarus Form Recovery, etc, etc...gotta archive EVERYTHING these days...everyone's become ban/delete happy. Makes me pine for the golden days of moderators, no control, self-censorship (blinders) being your only means of defense, thick skin's really too bad the World Wide Waste went in such a completely opposite direction. --Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 23:57, 20 December 2011 (CET)
Mmmmm...a fresh canvas...
That's the Argentinian fuck who censored my stuff...he's going to have to pay for it. See, I always believe that you should NEVER do to anyone what you wouldn't want done to, as such, if you do something, like try and censor or slander someone, then you should openly ~expect~ the same to happen to you. It's only fair. ^__^
And I ~always~ play fair...     `, )
    --Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 02:47, 21 December 2011 (CET)
Dude, it's wikipedia. Doing shit like that to everyone you bat an eyelid at is what being a staffer there is all about. - Vinland 16:45, 22 December 2011 (CET) – I'm surprised that they gave you the indefinite block instead of a three-day block. Well done. --JuniusThaddeus 03:23, 22 December 2011 (CET)
I enjoy the epic hypocrisy of forcing people supposedly against censorship to do just that. ^__^
One of my edits remains intact, surprisingly (near the bottom of the section):
I guess they just missed it. LOL
--Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 13:35, 22 December 2011 (CET)

Did you know for christmas

suggestions? º_º 22:13, 20 December 2011 (CET)


Just bouncing around some ideers. TylerRosenow º Ӕ talk º 13:17, 22 December 2011 (CET)

I made

a special christmas main page, User:Severus_Snape/special. How is it? º_º 23:28, 20 December 2011 (CET)

  • Slick work Snape. --RTDice 04:29, 21 December 2011 (CET)

Christmas Day PotN Suggestions

Jingle Meatballs.jpg Dear Children.jpg --Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 17:05, 22 December 2011 (CET)

I gotta go with Flying Spaghetti Monster on this one. --RTDice 21:26, 22 December 2011 (CET)

Livejournal fail.

Livejournal recently upgraded itself and the majority hates it. It's causing a lot of dramu and lulz. Might be worth looking into. They're messing with settings, turning ON automatic payments when they were shut off due to the massive hate related to the sitewide upgrade.

The hate is here.

Complaints to the BBB go nowhere. This page is on Dreamwidth.

Are you butthurt?Hello.jpg BAWWW here. 02:56, 23 December 2011 (CET)


What does that mean?--brxbrxbrxbrxbrxbrx-brxbrx 03:05, 23 December 2011 (CET)

HTH - Hope That Helps
HAND - Have A Nice Day
FOAD - Fuck Off And Die
DNE - Does Not Exist
FTW - For The Win
ITT - I think that
PPOSTFU - Post proof or shut the fuck up.
IKWYABWAI- I know what you are, but what am I
PKB - Pot, Kettle, Black
OTOH - On the other hand
QED - Quod erat demonstrandum, which literally means "which was to be demonstrated".
IIRC - If I Recall Correctly
AFAIC - As Far As I'm Concerned
AFAIK - As Far As I Know
SNUH - springfieldians for nonviolence understanding and helping
--Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 03:31, 23 December 2011 (CET)
Actually though most people just use IKYABWAI, or IKY for short. Basically if someone makes like their ass is up on the spin cycle screaming out, "I LOVE YOU PAUL REUBENS!", then you can just save yourself the effort of actually replying by just posting "IKY" or "PKB" or whatever other particular knee-jerk, cookie cutter, cog stamped lame they're retarding off for lack of anything better to reply with. Never reward sub par material, they can either deserve better...or bitch. --Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 03:46, 23 December 2011 (CET)
ITT FTW U PPOSTFU TKN 05:33, 23 December 2011 (CET)
Thank you, now I know--brxbrxbrxbrxbrxbrx-brxbrx 06:35, 23 December 2011 (CET)
And knowing is half the battle! The other half is GUNS of course...really, really big freakin GUNS! --Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 20:31, 23 December 2011 (CET)

Youtube copyright fags these days.

So I uploaded a public domain TV show clip of The Grim Adventures of Billy and Mandy on my youtube account. Then out of nowhere this guy from Millennium Entertainment Inc files a copyright complaint.

He claims he owns the right to a clip of a TV show owned by Cartoon Network. This shit is ridiculous.

Lord Tony 13:31, 23 December 2011 (CET)

Have some egg-nog and chill the fuck out; IT'S CHRISTMAS GUY!11 Mr Jonzz 15:54, 23 December 2011 (CET)

  1. It is copyrighted
  2. Its not in the public domain
  3. If its less than 2 minutes, claim it as fair use
TKN 19:22, 23 December 2011 (CET)

Hey lord Tony - Quit bawwing. I uploaded a video where three seconds of a Josh Groban song came on at the end and they muted it. For three seconds of a song nobody would have noticed. It's the WMG and Viacom and all the tightass copyrighters that are shitheads. I expect every vid to get muted or blocked and I'm surprised when they aren't. Get over it. Are you butthurt?Hello.jpg BAWWW here. 19:21, 23 December 2011 (CET)

They won't play with me anymore.  :(
The last one I got from YouTube, well, the only one, I went on the hunt, contacted YouTube directly, demanded that they give me the full copy of the DMCA notice including all relevant personal details as ~required~ by the DMCA...they fumbled out some really shit excuses. I then went off on an invective rant about how making claims of false DMCA notices without a genuine one being filed constitutes as a federal felony under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and as a result their owners could be looking at facing time in a federal prison, etc, etc...they apologized after that...profusely...and some uber head management person personally guaranteed me that it would never, ever, EVER happen again. Which is slightly's not much fun when they don't struggle at all. It is nice when they give you free stuff though. You'd be amazed at what you can get large corporate entities to fork over to you without even second guessing. My magical, fully uncapped cable modem that works anywhere in the United States, free of charge, courtesy of Charter, is one of my most prized wins.
Mmmm, some are more inclined to give freebies than others. For example Carl's Junior and Lego gives out stuff to their fan communities all the freakin time. I got a $25 gift card from Carl's Junior simply for writing them a two paragraph e-mail! Lots of corporations really like being buttered up and if you take the time (hardly any at all), you can get all sorts of neat coupons, freebies, gift cards, offers, etc.
...of course there are some who simply steal yer fuckin stuff without so much as a thank Hormel for example, the filthy little crotch crickets! --Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 20:23, 23 December 2011 (CET)
Proof of this plz. This interests me. - Vinland 20:39, 23 December 2011 (CET)
The cable modem? Or the YouTube stuff? That was all phone calls, no e-mails. I did recently get PayPal to break one of their own supposedly "unbreakable rules", regarding access to funds (supposedly you have to wait THREE DAYS after the person gets their merchandise and posts positive feedback)...but you can get them to release it on the same day if you threaten to report them to the FDIC for investment fraud.  :3
I can put up that e-mail if you want to see it. I do have ~other~ e-mails similar to the conversation with YouTube, regarding attempted DMCA claims against my various servers. Uh...keep in mind though, the MPAA/RIAA do *NOT* play fair, and while I was able to openly pirate data on my primary server that certainly didn't stop them from hammering it into oblivion with one of the largest DDoS attacks in history (against a single individual). They're used to getting what they way or the other.
There might be pictures of my magical cable modem up on my FB account's not much to look at though. It's actually becoming a bit worrisome because it's over ten years old and the connector on the back already broke, had to patch it back together with some duct tape...I'm thinkin they probably won't be inclined to give me a new one if I ask...given that it's been about a decade.
--Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 20:51, 23 December 2011 (CET)

DMCA's can be used for good. 20:28, 23 December 2011 (CET)

LOL, now that's funny!  :D
--Onideus Sig Rainbow Clouds.png 20:32, 23 December 2011 (CET)

proposing template:internal drama

... for articles like negi springfield, jacknstock, etc. comments? -hipcrime Emote Pop tart cat.gif 14:33, 23 December 2011 (CET)

I made this stupid video forever ago. Transformers lulz.

Are you butthurt?Hello.jpg BAWWW here. 19:25, 23 December 2011 (CET)

ACHTUNG: Calling all artfags!

Create more "Current Threat" images and categorize them under Category:Threat_Advisory, plzkthnx. º_º 21:02, 23 December 2011 (CET)

My bitches and whores one was never used for some reason, even though I submitted it months ago. - Vinland 23:02, 23 December 2011 (CET)


I got indef blocked for the third time on wikipedia, anybody willing to create some accounts for me? e-mail me username and password.--Sandstormsabove4 02:50, 24 December 2011 (CET)

Nah. ~Oblique 03:08, 24 December 2011 (CET)

Or is it because you've all already been banned.--Sandstormsabove4 20:39, 24 December 2011 (CET)

ED IS NOT your personal army. faggot. (oh and learn to hushmail or 10minutemail, faggot.) º_º 20:41, 24 December 2011 (CET)
so much for being the anti wikipedia--Sandstormsabove4 06:23, 25 December 2011 (CET)
lolwut <- moarhate 15:49, 27 December 2011 (CET)

>doesn't get what he wants
>whines like a bitch to make sure he doesn't get what he wants
>tries to guilt trip us with "So much for X"
>fuck you

TylerRosenow º Ӕ talk º 10:13, 25 December 2011 (CET) Im not doing this for something personal, im doing it for the sake of it, but fuck this shit, you all obviously already been banned.--Sandstormsabove4 23:46, 25 December 2011 (CET)

Know what? If you had asked "Hey, does someone have a spare wiki account? No? It's cool", I would have made you one. But now, you're just a baby who whines like he had been fucked in the ass by a steroid abusing trucker. Hugbox is that way. Zyklon 23:56, 25 December 2011 (CET)
Spare wiki account doesnt make sense, I need new wiki accounts, but im not gonna argue anymore.--Sandstormsabove4 01:23, 26 December 2011 (CET)
says who?--Sandstormsabove4 23:38, 26 December 2011 (CET)\
me <- moarhate 15:50, 27 December 2011 (CET)
your unintelligent--Sandstormsabove4 21:45, 27 December 2011 (CET)
Sandstormabove4, you are the only faggot who has a indefinitive block in TOW and/or doesn't knows how to evade it. Fuck you. Littlemudkip.gif  Snape    talk    contribs  Littlemudkip.gif 16:50, 29 December 2011 (CET)
Just create a new account. An indef block just means they blocked your account. Your IP is only auto-blocked for a day or so after your account is blocked, after that you can create as many new accounts as you like. --zaiger (talk) 17:27, 29 December 2011 (CET)