Russell Thomas Kinkade
||March 28, 1945
||Yucca Valley, California
||Scars/Tatoos: discoloration on or around right eyebrow, wears glasses, mole on right eye, scar on left wrist, scar on left forearm, scar on right wrist
||Boychat, Girlchat, BLISS, NAMBLA, Common Ground, VoA, Newgon
|Russell Kinkade AKA "Abraxas" and "Gatekeeper" is on such pedophile forum boards as BoyChat and VoA. He is a pedophile who promotes ways of getting around sex offender registration requirements. He admits to having a preference for both young boys and young girls.
Sex offender Robert Thomas Kincaide
Russell Thomas Kinkade AKA Abraxas AKA Gatekeeper is a well-known pedophile who is also a Registered Sex Offender (RSO). An active member of both BoyChat and GirlChat, Kinkade also acted as a co-host on the now-defunct Pedologues podcast in the earlier episodes. After a lengthy and unexplained absence, he returned in the fall of 2006 to participate once again in the capacity of a co-host just prior to the end of the podcasts in December 2006.
Previously convicted for sex crimes which include lewd and lascivious acts with a child under the age of 14, oral copulation with a person under 14 years of age, and child molestation, Kinkade is known to promote his ideas for working around requirements for registration of sex offenders. In one of his podcasts through Pedologues, he openly admits to having had sexual relations with a 13 year old boy, before turning his focus to sex offender registries, claiming that they are "hit lists" and that offenders should find ways to hide their true addresses.
After having posted as Abraxas for many years, being proud to be an "out" pedophile, we have discovered that he has shed the Abraxas nickname and is using the nick Gatekeeper, and refers to himself in the third person when referring to Abraxas.
Boy Lover is good enough for me, since my AoA is from birth to about 16.
i dont Abuse Little Boys , I but Love them and wanna make sure they grow up and be very productive adults in our community.
Loving, consensual intergenerational sexual relationships are not "abuse." I too "wanna make sure they [boys] grow up and be very productive adults in our community."
And, yes, I am a registered sex offender.
Note: I am not now sexually involved with anyone. [Me Cry]
- Our investigation of Kinkade was made simple by the fact that he is an out pedophile who often posts about being a registered sex offender.
- He has also been fairly loose with personal information, including his location.
- All information we have obtained on him has come directly from his own admissions, as well as confirmation from reliable sources (public records, sex offender registration).
Known Screen Names
- Tom Kinkade
- Tom Moniker
Known E-Mail Addresses:
Last Known Address
(Updated March 2008)
6460 DEL MONTE #A
YUCCA VALLEY, 92284
55580 Twentynine Palms Hwy. Space #15
Yucca Valley, CA 92284
7532 Irvine Ave
North Hollywood, CA 91605
Easier to be with a boy. Unless the girl is your daughter, or a friend your daughter has invited along, I think society questions big time a man hanging with a girl. Not so with a woman hanging with a girl.
It is just much easier for me to meet boys and play with them....not that kind of "play with" you perverts!
Not that I am opposed to that kind of "play with"! LOL
I think too many people over-analyze sex and sexuality, especially when it comes to intergenerational sexual relationships. To use a Beatles phrase, "Let it be."
Man/Boy love is a beautiful thing. And sex can be--and I think ought to be--part of that love. We don't need anything more than consent between two people who want to share sexually. There does not have to "informed" consent, or deep analysis, or "true" love, or long-term commitment (one night stands are good enough in the hetero world), or unselfish desires. All you need to do is fuck. Crude, but true.
One of my REALLY BIG peeves is people who say "Oh, yes, I believe in Boy Love (or Girl Love), and I am a Boy Lover (or Girl Lover). BUT, you cannot touch my son/grandson/daughter/granddaughter/whatever relative or friend, or I will kill you." (I've actually been threatened with death if I dared explore a possible relationship with one BLs grandchild. These people are not only BLs (or GLs), they are practicing BLs (or GLs). Sex is OK with any boy or girl, but not with theirs. Huh? Do they own a child just because they are a relative? Free Will/Free Agency belongs to each and every individual. There are people who avoid me because they have beautiful children. Are they afraid I will "molest" their child? If so, they do not know me well. No, I think they avoid me because--like in earlier examples in this paragraph--they are hypocrites.
I have over a decade living free of the law. I have done what I have had to do to obey inane, insane, idiotic laws. After all my efforts the state is once more going to punish me for things I did decades ago. I will loose my residence, possibly my job, property, and I will be homeless sleeping out of my car.
Proposition 83 will be voted on in California in about five weeks. Two of the provisions will affect me: residency restriction of 2,000 feet from a school or park, and wearing of an electronic monitor. Neither one of which I have needed for over a decade to refrain from illicit sex. And neither one will stop real molesters from harming children. They will run, go undergound, or just not give a damn. This law is going to destroy the lives of good people like me who just want to live in peace, it is going to cost the state upwards of 500 million dollars a year, and it will not protect any children.
And will anyone here give a damn? Doubt it. Who will give me housing in a better state? Who will help me find employment? Who will care when I am cold and hungry and homeless? Who will help?
This is what they want. Those of who are strong like me will be pushed until we break some silly bit of a law, and then they can come all high and mighty and haul our asses away, saying Look how we are protecting the children. Those not so strong will act out and quite possibly hurt or murder some child. Do not think that LEOs and politicians are concerned about this. It suits them: more money in their coffers, more elections won, more cops on duty. They are not concerned about children at all.
Sex Offender Lies:
All the more reason why gay and lesbian youth, and transgender youth, need AFs. We love them for who they are. We care. We are there for them, and we are good examples for them to succeed in life even against long odds.
And again, neither one of us want to advocate anything illegal. I totally advocate, I totally encourage people to obey the law. I just disagree with the law.
- 288 CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN/LEWD OR LASCIVIOUS
- 288(a) LEWD OR LASCIVIOUS ACTS WITH CHILD UNDER 14 YEARS
- 288a(c) ORAL COPULATION WITH PERSON UNDER 14/ETC OR BY FORCE/ETC
- f647a ANNOY/MOLEST CHILDREN
If you have any information regarding this individual's current whereabouts, contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
is part of a series on evil-unveiled.com.